Name: Humboldt_ETg_median.tif
Display Field:
Type: Raster Layer
Geometry Type: null
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Groundwater evapotranspiration (ETg) from phreatophyte vegetation is the primary component of natural groundwater discharge within the Humboldt River Basin. This report summarizes previous study estimates of ETg, and details methods and results of updated groundwater discharge areas, ETg rates, and ETg volume estimates developed in this study. Estimates derived in this study are summarized for the period of 1985-2015 and were based on a consistent place-based approach that relies on Geographic Information System and groundwater level data and a least-squares regression model that relates Landsat vegetation indices with evaporative demand, precipitation, and in-situ estimates of phreatophyte ET. Median annual ETg rates and volumes reported in this study are representative of pre-development conditions. Where irrigated areas were identified, ETg rates were adjusted to reflect the phreatophyte vegetation that likely occupied irrigated areas prior to cultivation. Results from this study were used to inform groundwater modeling studies by the U.S. Geological Survey and the Desert Research Institute, in cooperation with Nevada Division of Water Resources, to support conjunctive water management.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>Results and datasets are summarized and documented in the form of maps, graphs, tables, geodatabases, and metadata following Federal Geographic Data Committee standards and are available at www.dri.edu/humboldt-etg. Estimated pre-development total annual ETg volumes for the upper, middle, and lower Humboldt River basin are 158,500, 361,600, 55,900 ac-ft/yr, and 85,700, 248,400, and 46,100 ac-ft/yr when riparian lands are excluded, respectively. Discharge areas and median annual ETg rates and volumes were compared to previous estimates for respective ET Units and Hydrographic Areas. Results reported for the upper Humboldt River Basin indicate that potential areas of groundwater discharge are generally lower, and ETg rates and volumes are generally less than one half of the ETg rates and volumes reported by Plume and Smith (2013). Results reported for the middle Humboldt River Basin indicate that ETg volumes are higher in six, and lower in seven HAs when compared to previous estimates reported in Water Resource Bulletin and Reconnaissance Series reports. ETg rates and volumes in the middle Humboldt River Basin are also generally less than one half when compared to those reported by Berger (2000). Differences in ETg volumes are primarily due to differences in ETg rates and differences in groundwater discharge areas.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>This study used place-based satellite remote sensing, climate and GIS datasets, groundwater levels, and in-situ based phreatophyte ET empirical regression models to estimate potential areas of groundwater discharge, and ETg rates and volumes within the Humboldt River Basin. Future study estimates of ETg within the Humboldt River Basin could be improved by refining delineation of groundwater discharge areas, variability in ETg with respect to climate and land use change, and collection of in-situ ET estimates in areas where large uncertainty exists.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>Report – Groundwater Discharge from Phreatophyte Vegetation, Humboldt River Basin, Nevada</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>Dataset download from https://www.dri.edu/project/humboldt-etg/ on March 1, 2022.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Service Item Id: 3492ea8a07e744c6a2e1828580c52c60
Copyright Text: Desert Research Institute
Default Visibility: true
MaxRecordCount: 0
Supported Query Formats: JSON, geoJSON, PBF
Min Scale: 0
Max Scale: 0
Supports Advanced Queries: false
Supports Statistics: false
Has Labels: false
Can Modify Layer: false
Can Scale Symbols: false
Use Standardized Queries: true
Supports Datum Transformation: true
Extent:
XMin: 355485
YMin: 4307175
XMax: 682575
YMax: 4625565
Spatial Reference: 32611
(32611)
Drawing Info:
Advanced Query Capabilities:
Supports Statistics: false
Supports OrderBy: false
Supports Distinct: false
Supports Pagination: false
Supports TrueCurve: true
Supports Returning Query Extent: true
Supports Query With Distance: true
Supports Sql Expression: false
Supports Query With ResultType: false
Supports Returning Geometry Centroid: false
Supports Binning LOD: false
Supports Query With LOD Spatial Reference: false
Supports Percentile Statistics: false
Supports Having Clause: false
Supports Count Distinct: false
Supports Time Relation: true
Supports Sql Format: false
Supports Query Analytic: false
Supports Query With Current User: true
HasZ: false
HasM: false
Has Attachments: false
HTML Popup Type: esriServerHTMLPopupTypeNone
Type ID Field: null
Fields:
None
Supported Operations:
Query
Query Attachments
Query Analytic
Generate Renderer
Return Updates
Iteminfo
Thumbnail
Metadata